less social justice, more social vengeance

^-5

The messed up part is I kind of agree with her here. She's abrasive, bigoted, and a bit of an idiot, but I don't think she should be silenced. I believe in the marketplace of ideas, and no matter how wrong your opinions are, I believe that you are entitled to speak them, and I believe that the proper response to bad ideas is debate, *never* censorship. Assuming there actually is a campaign to get her vids flagged and removed (and this isn't just part of her paranoid persecution fantasies, confusing organized resistance with outright censorship campaigns), I'd be more than happy to take her side, and I believe most of you guys would, too.

So I'm glad she decided to censor comments, because now I can go back to hating her without reservation.

@EvilHomer

I actually wouldn't mind shooting the thoughts out with you. I have some thoughts on how people could easily more accept such concepts of LGBT, but it's borderline offensive.

God, I hope she's a troll.

she maintains and is aware of culture theory blogs.

@ Sudan no1,

She's every bit the attention whore that Jawsus was.

@ misterbuns.

Chris Chan & Nic Bravo also both posted their 'intellectual property' online. Both of them enjoyed the firestorms that erupted. She's no different than anyone else who seeks to become "Internet Famous".

p. good, but will unfortunately always live in the shadow of Pope Caius's "CISFORMERS - REALLY JUST SOME CARS"

Her video is about taking a stance against censorship.

If you're so offended by random internet strangers saying "fuck this gay shit" that you'd rather burn the whole thing to the ground, then I guess we can't stop you. It's dissapointing, but part of the freedom of "frontier living" here on the internet (where social contracts are loosely defined and largely unenforced) is that netizens are allowed to control the flow of information on their own little parcel of land. I can't make you declare the StanleyPain Homestead a free speech zone, and if you decide to digitally shoot all trespassers, then I guess the marketplace of ideas takes it all types.

But if you predicate your message on "I'm standing up for free speech, look how horrible it is that other people can't tolerate the existence my shit posts", then obviously you've got a moral obligation to extend that same tolerance to other people. Even if you support the moderating of others thoughts in principle, surely you can laugh at her for being a hypocrite?

Homer, you're as stupid as your namesake.

Faaaaaart.