he really doesn't seem like a crazy person
fuck i forget the symbol iz wanted to use uhh (I)?
|Binro the Heretic |
Given what I've learned about George Washington, beyond the fairy tales we were all force-fed as schoolchildren of course, I have no problem believing he had a lot in common with this guy, at least in his way of thinking.
Male and white, checkmate bitch.
Here comes George, In Control.
Chicks dug his snuff, and his gallant stroll.
Ate opponents brains,
and invented cocaine.
Believe me, I've known more than I like to know. They always come out of the woodwork whenever I've debated gun control.
I swear, I hate the gun industry, but I've been wanting to buy more, because I don't want to these psychos to be the only people with guns.
Your mistake is assuming "owning guns" being the common thread here. For a group of progressive-minded people like myself it's sad to see many of you continually fall for the childish notion that there is a "gun culture" responsible for this, and not each person responsible for their own actions. As it stands the most common thread running through these types of wackjobs is mental instability and drugs like Xanax, Prozac, and Lithium. What a novel concept, that each individual has their own accountability in the situation.
But I guess it's easier to just troll rather than admit you're being hypocritical. Blaming a "gun culture" is about the most buttfuck-ignorant thing you can possibly say for an insane individual's actions.
When making a persuasive argument, it's always helpful to call your audience trolls and accuse them of being buttfuck ignorant.
Actually, being asexual is about as buttfuck ignorant as you can be, due to biological limitations. Heterosexuality offers many diverse buttfuck opportunities, but no one loves buttfucking more than we fags. We tend to try and sacrifice our buttfuck ignorance as soon as possible.
Now this is a whole new direction you have us moving in, Gmork. And I am very curious; are you yourself "buttfuck ignorant" as defined so eloquently by The Dumpsta. If so, how then to understand your last statement? Without a through grounding in backdoor booty banditry, can we really take your opinions on this subject seriously?
Gmork, the problem with "gun culture" and "emotional intelligence" (Which would be the big advocate of dismissing gun control in this situation) is that it revolves around a moot point of "it's their own actions" and "you can't judge others". If that's the case, then how is there any way to stop this? Even in small towns there are key features people look for to validate a safe profile. Only difference between a small town and a big city is that there's less chance of having to leave a comfort zone and interact with people that you may unintentionally offend.
I would love to see you post of a democrat radio host with a pro-gun side during these recent events. Every loud mouth for pro-guns is in the most divisive set of conservative/republican shit hosers that could only gain fare from schizoids, (unfortunately I can't look up the word with out being bombarded by niche ads, but where you believe you're sick just because you hear about the symptoms), and simply the mentally ill. I would love to see someone valiantly going against the talk of gun control who would actually be the democrat side who isn't just a narcissistic label by douchebags trying to fulfill the "anything is possible" clause as an attempt to gain for their agenda.
I would also love to hear of any these right-wingers refer to "emotional intelligence" as if it's the backdrop cure for Barack ALLAH ACKBAR HUSSEIN JIHAD JIHAD JIHAD YEEHAW Obama's terrible "plan" for taking away every one's guns.
"For a group of progressive-minded people like myself"
Gmork has revealed himself to be a collective of quasi sentient crustaceans! just like we all suspected! ugh i feel so buttfucking ignorant for not believing you guys earlier
You have no idea how reactionary bivalves and mollusks can be.
Binro the Heretic
Washington and our other founding fathers didn't think everyone was created equal. They wrote "All men are created equal" and what they meant by that was white land-owning men like themselves. They didn't count non-land-owner, whom they regarded as mere peasants. They didn't count the indigenous peoples, whom they regarded as savage animals who should be exterminated. They didn't count the people they had kidnapped and brought over from Africa, whom they regarded as farm equipment. And they certainly didn't count women, whom they regarded as assets.
In their mind, men, real men like themselves, shouldn't be told what to do or how to act. They're special. They deserve authority over others who are not men. Only men are equal. All others must bow to the will of men. Do you really think this guy didn't hold similar beliefs?
|John Holmes Motherfucker |
Of course Washington would use the AK against the British. you don't turn down a major advantage in wartime, even if, maybe, you should. He doesn't seem to realize he's come up with something resembling the premise to Mark Twain's A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. That book ends in disaster, as the protagonist brings modern mass slaughter to the helpless Arthurians. The war would be nasty, brutish and short, unless the British got their hands on the AK, then it would be nasty, brutish, and long. And the British WOULD get their hands on the AKSo if Washington got an AIK would he4 have used it against the British.
Weird as it sounds, the AK 47 might end up on our flags, just for being a miraculous gift from the future.
But I really doubt if we'd have a second amendment. The ruling class would want to control this weapon.
John Holmes Motherfucker
Posted that by accident before I was finished editing, so, uh, sorry.
Hey, could someone post a link to what happened in Vegas?
This guy and his wife tried to start a revolution by shooting a couple cops and barricading themselves in a Walmart.
Why wouldn't you reverse engineer and then mass produce some magical future gun, especially while engaged in a war?! The fuck is your point?
At least we can both agree that Hitler and Stalin were not liberals, Mr. Bandana-Whacko.
He said if Washington had used an AK-47, it would be on our flag. Does that mean that Washington killed the British with ninja stars!?
First American Ninja!
From a related news story:
"A woman who says she lived near the couple told CNN affiliate KTNV that the married couple liked to dress up as the villainous "Batman" characters Joker and Harley Quinn.
The neighbor, Krista Koch, told the station the man also sometimes dressed as Slenderman, a fictional horror character that recently surfaced in the stabbing of a 12-year-old girl in Wisconsin."
... And Justice was the worst Metallica album.
Worse than St. Anger and all that shit after it too?
Thanks to those later albums, all Metallica now sucks equally, including Kill 'Em All, And Justice, and Master of Puppets. Metallica rewrote time and Cliff Burton became uncool pre-mortally post-humously. Metallica sucks that hard.
I don't consider St Anger et al to be Metallica albums.
This guy reminds me of my old neighbor who found one of those old school lime juice containers in his backyard, and managed to get the whole block evacuated because he thought it was a live grenade.
If George Washington had a minigun he'd be in a video game.
If he had lasers shooting out of his eyes, he'd be an internet meme.
I wasn't a big fan of Bioshock 3, to be honest.
Good news, everyone, gun rights once again has won a decisive victory! There was a school shooting in Oregon today!
10 kids per month are now dying by gun violence. No other product does that and gets to stay on the market.
Well answer me this, you godless homosocialist! If your fancy evolution theory is right, then kids will just evolve with bulletproof skin. So there's nothing to worry about?
Cars kill over 1,000 children per month, and have been doing so for almost a century now.
And that's *with* safety regulations. The thousand-plus death toll isn't just a short-term statistical anomaly; that's actually a huge improvement over how many children usually die from cars, historically and globally speaking.
I usually try to get them with the door if I can't outright run them over.
Door kills are an extra twenty points!
Unless you're saying people are intentionally killing more kids with cars than guns (which are being used to intentionally kill kids) your argument is suspect.
I'm not saying that America ISN'T so shitty that decades of child homicide have been going on right out in the open utilizing cars, but I'll need more evidence than just your saying so that these events weren't accidental.
Nobody's mentioning the fact that the fatality count was one higher as a result of a concealed carrying citizen drawing down on the dude in walmart and getting wasted by harleyquinn
It's been mentioned, and I don't see how it's a point against concealed carry, any more than the fact that two of the victims were police officers is a point against having cops. It's pretty clear from what few details are available that the poor guy had the drop on Johnny Rebel, and would have smoked the fucker right then and there, had he anticipated problem that the dude's girlfriend was armed, too.
there is frequently a response to shootings that if some brave citizen had been armed nearby the tragedy would've been averted.
i was just commenting on the lack of that dialogue line here and the reason for it.
I'm sorry, but is it Terrible to laugh at this? I'm just imagining this poor schlub coming on this scene and getting a raging hate boner on, all ready to go full rambo/eastwood/bronson. Only to be promptly capped in the head by the guy's girlfriend. "Sorry babe, this ain't rock and roll. This is ...genocide." she'd sigh as she blew the smoke from her still steaming muzzle. Fade to black.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|