Slumgullion - 2019-06-07
He's a CHIIIiiild molester! *throws Freud out the window*
|
gravelstudios - 2019-06-08
There is the theory that the whole movie is just Tom Green playing a huge prank on the movie industry. That he made the worst film he could make on purpose to highlight the absurdity that anybody would trust him to make a film in the first place. If that's true, it's pretty meta.
|
Miss Henson's 6th grade class - 2019-06-08 Nah. It's too far outside of Green's wheelhouse, which is gonzo performance art. Green probably knew that he was no actor, but I don't buy the idea that its badness was intentional.
I also have to say that I love the zebra who looks like his dad in the movie.
|
garcet71283 - 2019-06-08 Considering the plot of the film is that Tom Greens character is selling a shitty concept that he then squanders the money on I’m going with the meta.
Also, the name of the movie is literally referencing the sexual abuse of a child, so yeah, meta.
|
|
Nominal - 2019-06-08 You mean a movie where the plot is defrauding a movie studio with a terrible idea is actually about defrauding a movie studio with a terrible idea?
|
casualcollapse - 2019-06-09 I'm going to go with yeah definitely working the meta.
|
|
Register or login To Post a Comment |