Clever enough.

I'm fairly certain you're underthinking it.

If it's a choice, I'm not certain how the anti-gay groups "win". There are plenty of unnatural things people choose to do all the time. Not being a hardwired instinct doesn't make something wrong.

And if there's a genetic component, well then there's a whole host of genetic abnormalities we could eliminate in a child before it's born, like astigmatism, or blond hair. Would people with glasses be any less "wrong" in this designer-kid future you envision?

Anti-gay groups NEVER win.

They are boring, joyless folk who probably don't get laid too often.
When was the last time you saw those people throw a parade?

Wearing clothes isn't natural, for fuck's sake.

I'm not sure that throwing parades really makes you much of a winner either

Much more of a winner than getting brainwashed in a church does.

So if a choice is unnatural, it can be banned?

What kind of idiot logic is that?

By the time rightwing scientists figure out how to "isolate" a "gay gene" that can be "cured," there will be children walking around with animal penises instead of human penises. People won't just get sex changes, they will invent new genders, such as five labiaed, ten dicked sheeheeheemales. The Otaku subculture will have their own established churches where they will marry the children of these very same Christians to cartoon characters, and simulate consummation via cosplay. The costumes will be very well made.

All of these people will genetically modify themselves under the same logic that people with body identification disorders use (apotemnophiles for instance) in order to perform their various alterations and enforce their strange self images.

The world of genetic modification will be so fucked up that fundies will have much more to worry about than just Bobby the quarterback taking it from behind.

Wow baleen, shades of TanookiSuit's first couple of posts.