Granuaile - 2008-03-27
You better take some star sprinkles!
|
Konversekid - 2008-03-27
"The Soup: Fridays a 10PM on E!"
|
Sean Robinson - 2008-03-27
The sense that most of these things are done for the sole purpose of busting up interns and PAs of the show appeals to me.
|
|
Sean Robinson - 2008-03-27 Nah, it isn't canned. They yell out in-jokes and shit throughout the show. I'm pretty sure it is filmed inside an E! conference room with the staff just behind the camera.
|
Caminante Nocturno - 2008-03-27
These four stars are entirely for the horse-riding sequence.
Better make it three.
|
|
KnowFuture - 2008-03-27
man don't even JOKE about that.
|
AgentOrange - 2008-03-27
He's pretty convincing, and kinda pretty too.
|
Corman's Inferno - 2008-03-27
5 for the dog alone.
|
Cinnamon Imperialist - 2008-03-27
I should hate this. this many stars is going to ruin my internet cred.
|
TheDevilsDictionary - 2008-03-27
Talk Soup was such a great show when I would catch it in the 90s. I was surprised when I turned this on a while ago and found it was still pretty funny.
|
Mad Struggle - 2008-03-27
A little bit of everything, yet still filling.
|
cognitivedissonance - 2008-03-27
Seattle misses him. *sniff*
|
NoCode - 2008-03-27
A super sparkly 5 stars for BETTER TAKE SOME STAR SPRINKLES!
|
Rodents of Unusual Size - 2008-03-28
I don't know why I find this funny, as I've never found that guy funny. 5 stars for surprising me.
|
|
Hooper_X - 2008-03-28
-1 star for it not being the ACTUAL Rainbow Brite movie, which I never saw all the way through as a kid, and still vaguely wonder how it ends (I'm guessing "Rainbow Brite and her friends Save The Day.")
|
Richmond - 2009-01-11
Tough one. Guess I'll have to do the math.
+2 for a grown man humiliating himself
-1 for intent and irony
-1 for enjoying it (Flanders v. Simpson "Sunday Dress Reference" [1990]), total = +0
+1 for talking animals
Penalties for failed or inept attempts at humour do not apply in this borderline case, reason: unacknowledged incongruity / peripheral to narrative. Refer to case of Saget v. Dogs et al., (1992)
+1 (mandatory) for unexpected flying horse
+1 (aggregate) structural irony (Rainbow Brite with beard), 1980s pop culture reference, unbridled enthusiasm for aforementioned flying horse
-1 (aggregate) premise supremacy, laugh track, feelings of shame upon contemplating showing this at a YouTube party
= 3 stars.
|
|
Register or login To Post a Comment |