Okay, you've got me curious to know how you think he would have managed to pull that off.

If they can figure out a way to put a man on the moon, how come they can't figure out a way to let him pee on it once he's there?

http://www.geoffreylandis.com/vacuum.html

Relevant info at the bottom:
"On the subject of partial-body vacuum exposure, the results are not quite as serious. In 1960, during a high-altitude balloon parachute-jump, a partial-body vacuum exposure incident occurred when Joe Kittinger, Jr. lost pressurization in his right glove during an ascent to 103,000 ft (19.5 miles) in an unpressurized balloon gondola, Despite the depressurization, he continued the mission, and although the hand became painful and useless, after he returned to the ground, his hand returned to normal."

I'm sure they could make a suit that leaves his wiener unpressurized and open for long enough to take a leak. I don't know if the loss of blood to his appendage would stop him from being able to actually go, but it would be a cool thing to try. Also, he would need a special tool to grab it. Those suit gloves are unwieldy.

A pressurised pee plenum you place your penis in.

That would have been quite an arc.

You know how, when suddenly exposed to a vacuum, lungs will be evacuated of their air so quickly and violently, they'll hemorrhage?

Do you really think it wise to let the atmospheric pressure in your space suit determine the rate at which urine passes through your urethra into a vacuum?

And once you've taken care of that problem, the next technological hurdle is that water in a vacuum will boil faster than it can freeze. Without pressurized waste tanks, or valves engineered to withstand pressure from *both* directions, there's a risk of flash boiling urine creating enough back pressure inside the pipe to force the valve the wrong way and send cold piss slush back out of the input device. IIRC, someone discovered this phenomenon the hard way.

It would be extremely unfortunate if the valve in question was someone's bladder sphincter and the pipe was their urethera.

You can't drive a car on the moon! That's ridiculous!

Look at their feeble attempts to move that black frame around to disguise all the flaws their pathetic movie set!

It's all very simple video manipulation. The objects appear to bounce and fall slowly as if in low gravity because the film is being played at a slower-than-normal speed, and the dust appears to fall back down without forming dust clouds because the film is being played at a faster-than-normal speed.

Don't even get me started on the suspicious multiple light sources. There couldn't be any moonlight if they were standing on the moon, and everyone back on Earth would have noticed if there was a big glowing thing in the sky that wasn't the sun or moon!

OPEN YOUR EYES SHEEPLE

he drifted kinda close to that lander

Drifting: something else invented by NASA.

I have in fact seen stabilized versions of both the Zapruder film and the classic sasquatch footage.

You can do it yourself -- search for VirtualDub and Deshaker.

Can it be applied to the films of Michael Bay?

Bourne movies?