blah, singer not sing

If you show up to a Megadeth concert wearing a Metallica shirt, you deserve what you get.

true, it was a festival though, so it wasn't like everyone was there to see megadeth.

Hey, man, those guys up on the screen can't see you, you know.

Its okay to steal from Justin Beiber or Metalica, but not Danzig. Danzig works hard for his money. He's not a big superstar like those guys. Putting a video of him in concert is no different than stealing an apple from an apple stand.

But in what sense can a live performance even be considered property? If the concert was being recorded by Danzig for the purpose of creating a live concert video, then I suppose you could argue that some shmuck making a keepsake bootleg in some way infringes on Danzig's ability to monetize his own performances after the fact (assuming he actually has this right in the first place). It'd be a stupid argument, and it would still beg the question of how live performances can be considered property, but it could be made. However, this does not appear to be such a concert, so even that line of defense is invalid.

As for stealing apples, the two situations are nothing alike, and at any rate I'm sure AJ would be man enough to handle the thief with her own four hooves, rather than crowdsourcing the beating like a little coward.

There's a reason Danzig gets other people to do his fighting for him. http://www.poetv.com/video.php?vid=1022

Filming a live concert has always been bootlegging (not piracy). This is about as basic and fundamental as copyright law gets. It's just completely unenforcable now (but the flip side of that is the people filming it aren't like;ly to be making money selling their film later like they used to because everyone's filming everything so the films aren't really marketable anymore).