In fact, I will NOT ignore the Elon part.

Redpill Elon managed to become more tedious than old slimy techbro elon

Kim is good, need more of her and less mindless talking heads.

Public investigation work can still uncover many links which, by dissemination and questioning, may uncover more links but sadly there is nothing coming from the top down and yes, it seems pretty obvious that it is for protecting the most wealthy in favor of silence. Tracing money movement and other interactions is extremely hard. The retorts in the discussion are the main point which is that an investigation can be underway and hopefully is but the burden of proof is not met to even bother bringing up the case and even bringing up such a case would utterly ruin someone's finances and there you have it.

The male in the discussion is explaining the point above in essence and it is the best answer to the question raised in this video.

Considering the massive lashing out that Trump and his civil war declaring buffoon army are hooting after the DOJ investigation //went public// for his irresponsible handling of top secret documents, just think about the legal actions that would follow as a more wealthy variant of lashing out if investigations into these powerful folks went public "too soon" as the Trump defense team is claiming.

Therefore it'll take more time (the lag time of Trump's case from onset to public sharing of highly incriminating evidence was perhaps 2 years or so from initiation to now). The time it'd take to piece together a shadowy exchange of sex possibly on one-off bases that Epstein orchestrated would be several years and I think it's still getting started. Revealing who is being investigated is incredibly dangerous and stupid if you haven't clinched the argument already. Active cover-up steps will amplify in that case and they've already started also.

Therefore the legal teams responsible for handling this case are struggling against a giant and have to have a perfect legal argument before they announce anything. Meanwhile, journalism can begin to uncover links and should do so, example of such efforts that will hopefully also progress are below.

---------------
Tracing ties
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/21/business/dealbook/jeffrey-e pstein-resignations.html



When Jeffrey Epstein gave The Times columnist James Stewart a tour of his apartment a few years ago, he boasted of his expansive Rolodex of billionaires — and the dirt he had on them. A year and a half after the financier’s death by suicide in a New York jail, the fallout for those in the registered sex offender’s orbit, and increasingly those a step or two removed from it, continues to spread.

For example, the latest management reshuffle at Apollo, as we reported yesterday, can be linked back to Epstein. Tracing all the resignations and reshuffles directly and indirectly tied to the scandal will take a while (we’re working on it), but here’s a tally of some so far:

The Apollo co-founder Leon Black said in January that he would resign as C.E.O. but stay on as chairman, after an internal inquiry found he had paid $158 million to Epstein for tax advice. He unexpectedly quit both posts in March, and later stepped down as chairman of the Museum of Modern Art. Josh Harris, a fellow co-founder who had unsuccessfully pushed Black to quit immediately, said yesterday that he was stepping back from Apollo after failing to become the next C.E.O.; Marc Rowan, Apollo’s third co-founder and Black’s pick as successor, now leads the firm.

When the details of meetings between Epstein and Bill Gates burst into public view in late 2019, the billionaire’s wife, Melinda French Gates, hired divorce lawyers. The couple’s split, announced this month, could upend their numerous investments and philanthropic ventures

Les Wexner announced last February that he would step down as C.E.O. of the Victoria’s Secret parent company L Brands, under pressure from multiple internal investigations about his close ties to Epstein. Earlier this year, he and his wife, Abigail Wexner, said they would not stand for re-election to the L Brands board this month. (The company is now in the process of spinning off Victoria’s Secret.) Mr. Wexner was Epstein’s biggest early client and, a Times investigation found, the original source of the financier’s wealth.

Prince Andrew of Britain gave up his public duties last November, days after a disastrous interview with the BBC centered on his relationship with Epstein. At least 47 charities and nonprofits of which he was a patron have since cut ties to the prince.

Joi Ito resigned as the director of the M.I.T. Media Lab, a prominent research group, in 2019 and as member of several corporate boards (including The New York Times Co.), after acknowledging that he had received $1.7 million in investments from Epstein.

Alexander Acosta resigned as Donald Trump’s labor secretary in 2019, amid criticism of his handling of a 2008 sex crimes case against Epstein when he was a federal prosecutor in Miami.