Someone stop feeding this guy pot brownies.

What happens is you get Diebuster.

I do not understand what it is to say that something "is" math. Or, what the difference between that and saying that thing is "described completely" by math. I think the latter is true. But I think Kant's "existence is not a predicate" response to Anslem would apply to the claim that all things consistently describable by math exist. I don't know.