Parody. He makes fun of a lot of religious and unreligious zealots in his videos. Some are pretty good.

The man himself is real. Someone animated his stupidity for added comedic result.

His entire belief system seems predicated on his being too stupid to understand anything.

And you know what else? What's with Twinkies? I mean...dey got da cream on da inside, right? How'd get in dere? Youze atheist assholes gonna use your science to explain dat?

All I could think of was EAGLES ARE SNEAKY BIRDS.

The voice is supplied by someone named stonedcommander, thus the image is completely appropriate in this case.
Though in fairness, he was probably just dumb as all hell even before he started smoking it anyway.

I didn't realize anyone here was stupid enough to NEED answers to his questions.

I honestly can't tell whether you're fucking with us or whether you're really this retarded.

Either way, five stars.

I'll give you a serious rebuttal, though not particularly long.

Fish haven't "evolved" to avoid hooks because hooks are not a natural mechanism. They are men interfering with the life cycle of fish to catch them (more on that later). There is no possible way that evolution can catch up to compete with man-made ways of killing an organism. This is why conservation is important.
Idiots can also ask things like "why haven't fish evolved to avoid bears catching them and eating them?" Because nature isn't retarded. Bears need to eat. bears have been designed to catch fish. Fish have been designed with advantages to help avoid bears (live underwater, fast, agile, etc...), but nature would certainly not grant every eco-system invulnerable animals who constantly avoided death. Evolution and nature is about competition and keeping animals on their toes, for the most part. (though there are exceptions)

But, going into the hooks thing again, why do hooks even exist? because they are part of mankind's ability to use higher brain power to use tools to catch food. Therefore, mankind evolved into a higher thinking animal capable of such solutions to his problems. So maybe a better question would be "where did the hooks come from?" as opposed to why fish don't avoid them, which is a retarded argument to make anyway.

These people always fall back on "well, God made it that way" or some such nonsense which makes them far more unwilling to actually think about an issue. You can't "debunk" that kind of retardedness, and that's how creationists get by. by creating arguments so ridiculous or restrictive, you can't debunk them, just like the Kent Hovind example in the video.

planets A, are not perfectly round, and B, they were not created from an explosion.

hydrogen formed clouds in space, basically from becoming more dense other elements were created. as the mass grew, so did the gravitation pull off the mass, which started attracting more mass.

when the mass started colliding, it accreted into larger bodies, such as planetesimals, which had their own gravitational pull and attracted more mass creating bodies the sizes of planets.

there i disproved him. geology 101.

I will go ahead and add on to Stanley's points in a serious manner even though mark clearly doesn't deserve it.

- When you consider the total number of fish in all the bodies of water on Earth, the number of fish who actually get caught with hooks is a very small percentage. The majority of fish live out their lives in their lakes and oceans and never come in contact with humans and hooks. Evolutionary factors need to be consistent, persistent, and constant.

- THE EARTH IS BILLIONS OF YEARS OLD. The entire point of evolution is that minor, miniscule changes, over an EXTREMELY LONG period of time, like far longer than your Bible-addled brain can possibly grasp, add up to major changes and development of species. No one, not Darwin not ANYONE, ever claimed that evolution works to make significant changes over the course of 1,000, or even 100,000 years.
It's been, what, maybe 10 or 20 thousand years since humans invented and mastered the fish hook? That is not nearly enough time to give rise to species of fish who can know to avoid hooks, even IF my above point were not true, and even IF humans never advanced their own techniques for baiting and camouflaging hooks, which they have.

There, that's a genuine refutation of this video's points, which you will now gleefully ignore, I have no doubt.

5 stars for cena mark's stupefied silence

golden.

In a further related note, in major fishing zones some species of fish are getting smaller each generation. The reason is due to smaller fish escaping the nets (the primary way fishing is done, not hooks), therefore surviving to pass on their genes. In other words fish are evolving to escape nets. If hooks affected the survival rate of millions of fish in a population, or were used over an extremely long period, such evolution could very well occur.

While this out pour of response got Cena_mark erect, he can only climax at the sound of someone bashing the "liberal media" in person.

I'd like to see them defend why humans are the only species that have to clean themselves after they defecate.

God's miracle! Wet feces all over your ass and pus erupting out of your face.

I like your reply almost as much as the video.