so does this mean I can't do my zany parodies on youtube and submit them here, or that cena mark can't make vlogs about me? or are you referring to using names of users in tags and submitting stupid videos just to associate said user with them.

So, if I'm reading this right, you're the guy with the mangy dog, the mangy dog is the rules, the guy getting bit in the batch is someone getting banned, and the border collie is a NSFW video.

That's brilliant! Five stars!

People making videos etc fine. But renaming a gay marriage to be BALEEN'S WEDDING HAHAHA!!!! That is just stupid.

Submitting that anonymously? Ban.

Why is "anonymous" even allowed?

... we still get to see the rest of Caminante's wedding videos though, right?

I always wondered why the "Don't submit NSFW videos" thing seemed to be so hard for people to comprehend.

I'm disappointed in the lack of bouncing fat women in panties on this site.

Your thought - if this is safe for Canadian TV it is safe for here is pretty true.

All of this isn't because I am a prude, it is simply if the site gets tagged people at work will not be able to visit. That would suck.

People at work should be able to visit. People should be able to link to a video and know the rest of the site is safe etc.

My work bans this site. Then again my work bans almost everything.

Can we please include black labs being fed to sharks?

Octopus vs. shark...? Or Rotten.com type stuff?

I've been meaning to ask this (even though it's unrelated) How do you do a resubmit? I couldn't find a prompt on that.

That was not meant to go under the death clip line.

Though, duly noted.

The "Update Dead Link" text can be found just underneath videos, on the right margin.

The shark DIDN'T ACTUALLY eat the dog! It was two seperate clips, one of a dog swimming and one of a shark, spliced together for the sole purpose of the creator of the video to have a medium through which to produce his insane conspiracies like how we don't really have to pay taxes.

Also, there have been plenty of videos submitted in the past that use fuck, and worse words according to FCC standards...so are those off limits or simply colorful?

I think he means all audio is considered SFW. If you're blaring PoeTV so loud at work that your boss hears a curse word, you were getting fired anyways.

you're probably right Syd, I know audio was never an issue in the past.

I worded that poorly, Syd is correct. Audio is always SFW. If you blare your speakers at work, you get what you deserve. but if you have headsets on and your boss sticks his head in, he will be none the wiser.

Unless you work at my office, at which point you call a bunch of people over and go HOLY SHIT DUDES CHECK THIS OUT! THAT REPORTER LADY JUST GOT CREAMED BY THAT INFLATABLE BALL THING!

(but that's neither here nor there.)

SERIOUS RESPONSE: So let me clarify and be a pedantic toolbag - posting robots pretend-fucking and going LOL HOOPER_X WEDDING NIGHT is bad. Posting robots pretend-fucking as "Robots Pretending To Hump" and slapping a "Hooper_X" tag on there is... not as bad, but still kind of retarded?

I'm only asking because the "Caminante Nocturno" tag has become really useful at finding some soul-scorchingly bad things. I don't think any of the other user novelty tags are any good (maybe "Frank Rizzo")...

Tourettes guy is why I bought another pair of headphones

in all fairness, the 'Roachbud is a bouner' tag is gold if you were around for past shenanigans, so username tags do have some merit, but that is neither here nor there.

Oh man I was just about to post this TOTALLY AWESOME VIDEO where a HOT BABE gets her HOOTERS OUT ON CAMERA and you can TOTALLY SEE LIKE PART OF HER NIPPZ and it's SEXY plus there are a bunch of ads for great services you need. Like porn!

GAY CHUBBY DATING

"Totally intense firefight from Iraq. Apperently insurgent cowards were hiding in the skin of 14 year old children, and a marine took this video by attaching a cell phone camera to his foreskin."

I was just thinking somebody's mom called to complain.

MISTER CHET MY SON WAS LOOKING AT CARTOON CLIPS ON YOUR POET VIDEO SITE AND HE SAW A LINK TO *BREASTS*.

I don't think Chet has a complaint line.


Just saying.

Actually, the cartoon clip had breasts in it. But they were on James, who's a cross-dresser, so it's not like they were real female breasts or anything.

oh. retroactive -3 stars for terrible tasting beer. But rules are rules.

If your boss is a porn producer and you find yourself bored at work, you should seek help (or try socializing with your co-workers).