Part 2

As usual, the affirmative argument essentially boils down to: "There's lots of stuff we don't understand yet. Magic man done it."

Also, for the love of fuck, dude, you have a microphone - stop fucking shouting.

First time I've heard Hitchens debate. I like his point that certain moral atrocities are wholly dependent on religious belief, whereas the same thing cannot be said of atheism. In other words, religion is unlikely to improve your ethics, but might in fact prove a turn for the worse.

Turek can offer only the same weak, hackneyed apologetics you'd find from any other religious ersatz intellectual.