Well, I'm convinced. If a baby can emulate things it sees adults doing, then the universe has a face and a penis and cares what kind of fish we eat. It's all so obvious.
Considering that evangelists count on fully grown human beings to puppet religious "experiences" in order to prove the validity of their craft, I don't think that seeing a small child do the exact same thing is very much out of the question.
or, you know, edited the video and uploaded the relevant part because while a baby dancing is mildly interesting to parents nobody gives a shit about a baby standing around.
Now come on Smelldick, I know its cool here to be super anti religious, but teaching your child religion is not child abuse. The baby looks pretty damn happy if you ask me.
I might put up the child abuse tag to spite Cena. My problem is that you're both right in my opinion. It's not necessarily child abuse to expose them to religion and see what they do. But this kid obviously learned his moves from a real nutball. So I'm thinking that this particular instance might warrant the child abuse tag. I need more opinions.
Reddit
Digg
Stumble
Facebook