|Hooper_X - 2009-09-18 |
The royal ass-beating begins at 5:10, and it is GLORIOUS.
|chumbucket - 2009-09-18 |
|simon666 - 2009-09-18 |
I really thought he was going to puss out there and not say what he said at the end. I happily stand corrected.
|Stog - 2009-09-18 |
Fox seems to be catering a lot to the revolutionary retard demographic as of late.
|Rodents of Unusual Size - 2009-09-18 |
Mmmmm, the taste of bitchslap.
|Gojira1000 - 2009-09-18 |
I love me an Angry Sanchez.
Really, I suspect we need more straight up disputation of BS, less whining fear masquerading as politeness.
|alltogethernow - 2009-09-18 |
If I concentrate hard enough, can I produce Rick Sanchez's child?
I can right?
Now all I need to do is obtain his seed.
|Scrotum H. Vainglorious - 2009-09-18 |
Fox loves this kind of attention. And remember, it was CNN who gave the televised world Nancy Grace and Glenn Beck.
|charmlessman - 2009-09-18 |
I am officially a Rick Sanchez fan now.
This self-tasing hairhelmet and his pseudOlberman rant shitck has nothing to offer you in the long run except disappointment; while acting as a fleshy barometer indicating a sorry forecast for a valid fourth estate emerging anytime in the near future.
In other words, CNN bashing Fox is like a heroin junkie admonishing a meth head for being irresponsible.
|Comeuppance - 2009-09-18 |
Not that this will accomplish anything. Fox News viewers won't see this, the apology will be brief and insincere (provided that they make one), and neutrality will still be completely absent from Fox News. Chances are, they'll re-edit this, take it out of context, and somehow try to make it look like CNN is wrong. "So, CNN covered it, or whatever, but they didn't do a very good job, not nearly as good a job as we did. Technically, I guess CNN /kinda/ covered it, so, sorry, you whiny kids."
Four stars of brass balls, though.
|wtf japan - 2009-09-18 |
Sanchez is not a smart man, but even he somehow gets transfigured into a wrathful god of rationality by opposing this madness.
|Camonk - 2009-09-18 |
Great, now attack them on lies that actually fucking MATTER. Oh boo hoo they lied about your channel. They've been lying about IMPORTANT SHIT for MONTHS. Get on your high horse about that, you fucking milquetoast shitheads.
Yeah, it would be great if these news agencies competed against eachother by trying to see who can do a better job. First channel to do actual investigative reporting will take a strong lead, and that won't be Fox. If CNN really wants to impress me they should stop reading Twitter to me. It would be great if these networks would stop spending money on 3D holograms and giant ipod touches, and maybe leave some resources for getting into the field and finding the information I myself can't investigate during the day because I'm at work all day doing MY job. fucking bloody hell.
|Cena_mark - 2009-09-18 |
He's just pissed off because he's on CNN and nobody watches his show.
|StanleyPain - 2009-09-18 |
This guy's show isn't bad. It's probably one of the more level-headed news analysis type programs out there despite his occasional angry rants, but usually they're for a good reason.
He's about as smart as a jar of mayonnaise, and spends half of his air time reading Facebook comments back to the same people who posted them. I think he's actually just a Richard Kind character.
|memedumpster - 2009-09-19 |
The news IS the news!!!
|Broose182 - 2009-09-20 |
| Register or login To Post a Comment|